Why is it that dont people think you can contract HIV from oral sex?

Answer:
Some people seem to think that a "sexually transmitted disease" means that it can only be transmitted through actual intercourse. Of course this is false and all exchanges of infected bodily fluids can infect you with HIV or any other STD. Oral sex included.Practice safe sex, people!

---

A lot of people don't consider themselves sexually active if they only have oral sex.

---

Just possibly because the CDC says there has never been one confirmed cases caused by oral sex.STRAIGHT AIDS MYTH SHATTERED - New York PostNew York Post
March 19, 2004 THE public health experts - and their amen corner in the media - owe Helen Gurley Brown an apology.The legendary Cosmopolitan editor was vilified in 1993 when she published a piece called "The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS." But she was right.Eleven years later, Details is asking: "Whatever Happened to AIDS and Straight Men?" The article states, "A disease-free man who has unprotected sex with a drug-free woman stands a one in 5 million chance of contracting HIV."The story by Kevin Gray also cites a joke that made the rounds of the New York City Department of Health as statistics came in showing that the predicted spread of AIDS to heterosexuals wasn't happening:
"What do you call a man who got HIV from his girlfriend? . . . A liar." "I feel somewhat vindicated," Brown told PAGE SIX.Michael Fumento, who wrote the original 1990 book titled "The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS," said, "I'm not waiting for an apology. It's not going to happen."When Basic Books published Fumento's tome, "Distributors refused to handle it," he says. "Stores refused to carry it. And at many stores that did have it, clerks left it in the basement."
Celia Farber, who wrote an AIDS column in Spin magazine, was routinely attacked because she refused to rehash the propaganda put out by AmFAR and other groups.
"Everybody who was wrong got journalism awards. Everybody who was right got all but driven from the profession," Farber said.Farber exposed the conspiracy between profit-hungry drug companies, researchers who wanted more funding, homosexuals who didn't want the disease to be known as "the gay plague," and conservatives who wanted to turn back the sexual revolution. "They believed in what they were doing, not what they were saying," Fumento said. "They knew it was lies. They felt the end justified the means."At a recent editorial meeting at Seed, the new science magazine, Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter Laurie Garrett supposedly threatened to quit when a colleague suggested a story about Peter Duesberg, a leading retrovirologist.Duesberg lost his funding, his laboratory, and his students when he announced in 1987 that HIV doesn't cause AIDS. "He lost everything," said one insider. Duesberg switched to cancer research, and is now touted to win a Nobel Prize.

---

Its a lower risk activity but not a no risk activity. It is due to the direct exchange of bodily fluids and chance of blood contact. However, for safer practice condoms or dental damns should be used. This information has always been present in any sort of AIDS awareness information package I've seen.The same as lesbian sex is a lower risk activity, but not a no risk activity.If people don't know that, I guess that they don't consider it important to have all the facts.

---